Amuse vs Stem
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
Amuse
Free music distribution forever
Stem
Splits and distribution built for collaboration
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ Amuse Pros
- +Completely free forever
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Fast distribution
- +Mobile-first experience
- +Label opportunities for standout artists
- +No hidden fees
âš Amuse Cons
- -Limited features on free plan
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Basic analytics
- -Limited customer support
- -Pro plan required for advanced features
✓ Stem Pros
- +Automatic revenue splitting
- +Perfect for collaborations
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Transparent payments
- +Fast distribution
- +Great for producers
âš Stem Cons
- -Annual fee required
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Limited promotional tools
- -Focused on splits, less on marketing
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →Amuse vs Stem: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between Amuse and Stem depends on your release frequency and priorities. Amuse uses a free pricing model, while Stem operates on a subscription basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, Amuse offers better value at $0.00 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find Amuse more cost-effective at $0.00 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.