AWAL vs Stem
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
AWAL
Artist services for the ambitious
Stem
Splits and distribution built for collaboration
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ AWAL Pros
- +No upfront costs
- +Professional marketing support
- +Playlist pitching services
- +Advanced analytics dashboard
- +Keep 85% of revenue
- +Industry connections
âš AWAL Cons
- -Application required (selective)
- -15% commission on all revenue
- -Longer distribution times
- -Focus on artists with established presence
- -Can be slow to respond
✓ Stem Pros
- +Automatic revenue splitting
- +Perfect for collaborations
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Transparent payments
- +Fast distribution
- +Great for producers
âš Stem Cons
- -Annual fee required
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Limited promotional tools
- -Focused on splits, less on marketing
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →AWAL vs Stem: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between AWAL and Stem depends on your release frequency and priorities. AWAL uses a commission pricing model, while Stem operates on a subscription basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, AWAL offers better value at $0.00 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find AWAL more cost-effective at $0.00 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.