DistroKid vs Stem
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
DistroKid
Unlimited uploads for one low price
Stem
Splits and distribution built for collaboration
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ DistroKid Pros
- +Unlimited uploads for one low price
- +Fast distribution (1-2 days)
- +Keep 100% of your royalties
- +YouTube Content ID included
- +Automatic revenue splitting for collaborations
- +No hidden fees
âš DistroKid Cons
- -Annual fee required to keep music live
- -Basic customer support
- -Limited promotional tools
- -No label services or A&R support
✓ Stem Pros
- +Automatic revenue splitting
- +Perfect for collaborations
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Transparent payments
- +Fast distribution
- +Great for producers
âš Stem Cons
- -Annual fee required
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Limited promotional tools
- -Focused on splits, less on marketing
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →DistroKid vs Stem: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between DistroKid and Stem depends on your release frequency and priorities. DistroKid uses a subscription pricing model, while Stem operates on a subscription basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, DistroKid offers better value at $19.99 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find DistroKid more cost-effective at $19.99 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.