LANDR vs Stem
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
LANDR
Stem
Splits and distribution built for collaboration
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ LANDR Pros
- +Keep 100% of your royalties
- +Publishing administration available
- +YouTube Content ID included
- +Fast distribution speed
- +Wide distribution (150+ platforms)
- +Open to all artists (no application required)
âš LANDR Cons
- -20% commission on YouTube Content ID (high for a paid subscription)
- -High one-time fee for cover song licensing ($15)
- -Aggressive upselling of AI mastering and studio tools
- -Strict anti-fraud filters occasionally flag legitimate releases
✓ Stem Pros
- +Automatic revenue splitting
- +Perfect for collaborations
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Transparent payments
- +Fast distribution
- +Great for producers
âš Stem Cons
- -Annual fee required
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Limited promotional tools
- -Focused on splits, less on marketing
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →LANDR vs Stem: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between LANDR and Stem depends on your release frequency and priorities. LANDR uses a subscription pricing model, while Stem operates on a subscription basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, LANDR offers better value at $23.99 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find LANDR more cost-effective at $23.99 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.