AWAL vs ONErpm
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
AWAL
Artist services for the ambitious
ONErpm
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ AWAL Pros
- +No upfront costs
- +Professional marketing support
- +Playlist pitching services
- +Advanced analytics dashboard
- +Keep 85% of revenue
- +Industry connections
âš AWAL Cons
- -Application required (selective)
- -15% commission on all revenue
- -Longer distribution times
- -Focus on artists with established presence
- -Can be slow to respond
✓ ONErpm Pros
- +Transparent pricing with minimal hidden fees
- +Publishing administration available
- +YouTube Content ID included
- +Open to all artists (no application required)
âš ONErpm Cons
- -High 30% commission on YouTube and Social Video
- -Strict content review process often rejects 'generic' content or beats
- -Support is frequently reported as unresponsive for DIY tier users
- -Reports of difficulty transferring catalog metadata to other distributors
- -15% commission on revenue
- -Limited or slow customer support
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →AWAL vs ONErpm: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between AWAL and ONErpm depends on your release frequency and priorities. AWAL uses a commission pricing model, while ONErpm operates on a commission basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, AWAL offers better value at $0.00 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find AWAL more cost-effective at $0.00 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.