DistroKid vs Record Union
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
DistroKid
Unlimited uploads for one low price
Record Union
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ DistroKid Pros
- +Unlimited uploads for one low price
- +Fast distribution (1-2 days)
- +Keep 100% of your royalties
- +YouTube Content ID included
- +Automatic revenue splitting for collaborations
- +No hidden fees
âš DistroKid Cons
- -Annual fee required to keep music live
- -Basic customer support
- -Limited promotional tools
- -No label services or A&R support
✓ Record Union Pros
- +Keep 100% of your royalties
- +YouTube Content ID included
- +Wide distribution (150+ platforms)
- +Quality customer support
- +Open to all artists (no application required)
âš Record Union Cons
- -Annual renewal fees per release make it expensive for large catalogs compared to flat-fee models
- -No native publishing administration service
- -A&R recruitment model can lead to spammy promotion tactics by users
- -High payment threshold ($25)
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →DistroKid vs Record Union: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between DistroKid and Record Union depends on your release frequency and priorities. DistroKid uses a subscription pricing model, while Record Union operates on a pay per-release basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, Record Union offers better value at $10.00 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find DistroKid more cost-effective at $19.99 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.