Stem vs United Masters
Head-to-head comparison of pricing, features, and value
Quick Verdict
Feature Comparison
Stem
Splits and distribution built for collaboration
United Masters
Keep your rights, build your future
Cost Breakdown by Release Frequency
1 Release per Year
Occasional artist, testing the waters
5 Releases per Year
Regular release schedule
10 Releases per Year
Frequent releases, prolific artist
Pros & Cons
✓ Stem Pros
- +Automatic revenue splitting
- +Perfect for collaborations
- +Keep 100% of royalties
- +Transparent payments
- +Fast distribution
- +Great for producers
âš Stem Cons
- -Annual fee required
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Limited promotional tools
- -Focused on splits, less on marketing
✓ United Masters Pros
- +Free distribution option available
- +Brand partnership opportunities
- +Sync licensing built-in
- +Mobile-first experience
- +Keep your masters
- +Artist-friendly terms
âš United Masters Cons
- -10% commission on free plan
- -Fewer platforms than competitors
- -Focus primarily on hip-hop/urban
- -Limited international presence
- -Analytics could be better
More Comparisons
Need Help Choosing?
PitchPlus analyzes your release schedule, budget, and goals to recommend the perfect distributor and create a complete release strategy.
Get Personalized Recommendation →Stem vs United Masters: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between Stem and United Masters depends on your release frequency and priorities. Stem uses a subscription pricing model, while United Masters operates on a commission basis.
For occasional artists releasing 1-2 songs per year, United Masters offers better value at $0.00 per year. However, frequent releasers with 10+ songs annually will find United Masters more cost-effective at $0.00 per year. Consider your support needs, distribution speed requirements, and publishing administration options when making your decision.